WORKFLOW

Decision Brief

Break deadlocks by comparing options with evidence, tradeoffs, and risk.

What this solves

This workflow replaces indecision and circular debate with a short brief that recommends a path and a reversible next action.

When to use / when not to use

  • Use when choosing between two or three strategic options.
  • Do not use for decisions that require legal, clinical, or compliance approval.

Inputs needed

  • Decision question and options
  • Success criteria and constraints
  • Known risks and assumptions

Copy-ready prompt block

Create a one-page decision brief.

Decision: [question]
Options: [A, B, C]
Criteria: [cost, speed, risk, upside]
Constraints: [budget, deadline, team capacity]

Output requirements:
- Score each option 1-5 by criteria
- List top risks and mitigations
- Recommend one option with confidence level
- Include first 7-day action plan

Execution steps

  1. Define the decision in one sentence.
  2. List only viable options, not wish-list ideas.
  3. Run the prompt and challenge weak assumptions.
  4. Choose the recommendation and assign owner for day-one action.

Expected output format

Decision Summary
...

Option Scores
A: Cost x, Speed x, Risk x, Upside x
B: ...
C: ...

Top Risks + Mitigations
- ...

Recommendation
Chosen option:
Confidence:
Why:

7-Day Action Plan
Day 1-2:
Day 3-5:
Day 6-7:

Concrete example

A team choosing between hiring, outsourcing, or automating support selects automation first because it reduces repeat volume fastest with lower fixed cost, while outsourcing becomes the fallback if SLA risk rises.

Common mistakes

  • Using vague criteria like “better”
  • Ignoring downside scenarios
  • Skipping first-week action plan

Quick quality check

  • Options are mutually distinct
  • Scores map to stated criteria
  • Recommendation names one owner
  • First action happens within 48 hours

Next step

Get decision templates and scorecards in the free Starter Kit.

Get the Starter Kit